Age Gap Comparison
Compare two whole-year ages and read the selected state summary as a starting point for research.
Before you use this tool
This tool is a starting point for understanding how a state's age of consent and any close-in-age (Romeo and Juliet) provision generally apply to a given age pair. It is not a verdict. It does not interpret aggravating factors such as authority relationships, force, incapacity, digital communications offenses, prior convictions, marriage status, or federal offenses.
To use the checker, select a state and enter both parties' ages. The tool will summarize the relevant statutory framework and direct you to authoritative resources. Always verify with the official statute and a licensed attorney before drawing any conclusion about a real-world situation.
This summary does not determine whether an exception applies. Check the specific offense, exact birthdates, statutory conditions, and other applicable laws.
Whole-year age difference: 2 years. The Alabama guide lists a general age of consent of 16 and this close-in-age summary: "Yes — within 2 years". These are research references, not a finding that the provision applies. Whole-year inputs do not establish the exact birthdate gap.
Official Sources
- Alabama Legislature — Official StatutesUse this directory to reach the official statute database for the selected state.
- Cornell Law School — Legal Information InstitutePlain-language overview of statutory rape and close-in-age provisions across U.S. states.
- U.S. Department of Justice — Federal Sexual Abuse of a MinorFederal 18 U.S.C. § 2243 framework, which can apply alongside state law.
- National Conference of State LegislaturesTracks legislative changes to consent, marriage, and related statutes.
Find the relevant jurisdiction in the Cornell LII state law directory. Check the exact section and effective date in its official code.
State-Law Limitations of This Tool
- Does not account for relationships of authority (teacher, coach, guardian, employer, clergy, medical provider), which usually void any close-in-age exemption.
- Does not consider force, threats, coercion, intoxication, or incapacity — any of which can elevate charges regardless of age.
- Does not evaluate digital conduct (sexting, image transmission, online solicitation), which is often prosecuted under separate statutes.
- Does not reflect prosecutorial discretion, plea practices, or local court interpretations.
- Does not capture federal law (interstate travel, online communications, military jurisdiction, tribal land).
- Does not track every recent statutory amendment — always verify against the official state code linked above.