Age Gap Legality Checker
An educational estimator that compares two ages against the close-in-age (Romeo and Juliet) provisions of any U.S. state.
Before you use this tool
This tool is a starting point for understanding how a state's age of consent and any close-in-age (Romeo and Juliet) provision generally apply to a given age pair. It is not a verdict. It does not interpret aggravating factors such as authority relationships, force, incapacity, digital communications offenses, prior convictions, marriage status, or federal offenses.
To use the checker, select a state and enter both parties' ages. The tool will summarize the relevant statutory framework and direct you to authoritative resources. Always verify with the official statute and a licensed attorney before drawing any conclusion about a real-world situation.
Based on the information entered, this may fall within a close-in-age exception in some situations. Laws vary by state. Review the official statute or speak with a licensed attorney.
Both individuals are at or above Alabama's general age of consent (16). Other laws (authority relationships, marriage age, digital communications, federal law) may still apply.
Official Sources
- Alabama Legislature — Official StatutesUse this directory to reach the official statute database for the selected state.
- Cornell Law School — Legal Information InstitutePlain-language overview of statutory rape and close-in-age provisions across U.S. states.
- U.S. Department of Justice — Federal Sexual Abuse of a MinorFederal 18 U.S.C. § 2243 framework, which can apply alongside state law.
- National Conference of State LegislaturesTracks legislative changes to consent, marriage, and related statutes.
Find the relevant jurisdiction in the Cornell LII state law directory. Check the exact section and effective date in its official code.
State-Law Limitations of This Tool
- Does not account for relationships of authority (teacher, coach, guardian, employer, clergy, medical provider), which usually void any close-in-age exemption.
- Does not consider force, threats, coercion, intoxication, or incapacity — any of which can elevate charges regardless of age.
- Does not evaluate digital conduct (sexting, image transmission, online solicitation), which is often prosecuted under separate statutes.
- Does not reflect prosecutorial discretion, plea practices, or local court interpretations.
- Does not capture federal law (interstate travel, online communications, military jurisdiction, tribal land).
- Does not track every recent statutory amendment — always verify against the official state code linked above.