In this article
Ask a lawyer to identify the exact law, apply it to the exact ages and conduct, and explain what you need to do next. “Does the Romeo and Juliet law cover us?” is a useful starting concern, but it is too broad to resolve a real case. A close-in-age rule might prevent an offense, provide a defense, affect punishment, or concern registration only.
The best consultation produces specific answers and a short action list. You should leave knowing whom the lawyer represents, which issues remain uncertain, what deadlines apply, and what additional information is needed. You do not need a polished narrative or a folder of intimate images to make the first appointment.
Begin by stating the actual problem
Tell the lawyer whether you are planning boundaries for an existing relationship, responding to police contact, facing a filed charge, or dealing with consequences from an older conviction. These are different assignments. A lawyer cannot sensibly prioritize the discussion without knowing which one applies.
Mention urgent events at the start: an interview request, court date, subpoena, impending move, or order restricting contact. Do not spend the entire appointment discussing a possible defense and reveal an immediate deadline as you leave. Bring the document containing the deadline if you have it.
A concise opening might be: “The people involved were seventeen and nineteen on the date in question. Police contacted one family yesterday. We need advice before responding, and we have not received a charging document.” That gives the lawyer a workable starting point without asserting a legal conclusion.
Ask which jurisdiction and which version of the law apply
Provide the locations where the relevant conduct occurred, not just where each person currently lives. If communications, travel, or images crossed state lines, describe those facts. Ask whether more than one jurisdiction requires analysis and whether federal law raises a separate issue.
Then ask which version of the statute governs the event date. An article describing today's rule may not answer a question about conduct several years ago. Likewise, a newly announced change may have an effective date or limited application that matters to the case.
The lawyer should explain why a particular law is relevant. A useful question is, “What facts connect this case to that statute?” The answer may identify an act, location, relationship, or communication that the family had overlooked. It can also reveal that the original concern was framed around the wrong legal issue.
Put exact dates ahead of rounded ages
Bring each person's birth date and the date or date range of the alleged conduct. “About two years apart” may conceal a difference that matters under a rule measured in months or years. If there were multiple events, identify them separately rather than treating the relationship as one undated occurrence.
Ask how the applicable law calculates the age difference and which ages matter at the relevant time. A birthday may affect one event without changing the analysis of an earlier one. Current ages do not automatically determine the legal status of past conduct.
Arizona illustrates why wording matters. Section 13-1407(E) describes a defense for specified offenses with conditions involving the younger person's age, the defendant's age or high-school attendance, a maximum twenty-four-month gap, and consensual conduct. That is a particular statutory formula, not a nationwide rule that everyone within two school grades is exempt.
Identify what the close-in-age provision actually does
Ask whether the age relationship is part of the offense definition, an exception, an affirmative defense, a grading provision, or a form of later relief. Those categories can lead to different procedures and consequences. The label used in a blog headline cannot supply the answer.
If it is a defense, ask how it is raised and what evidence is needed. If it affects punishment, ask whether a conviction still occurs. If it concerns registration, ask whether it changes the underlying conviction at all. These questions turn a reassuring phrase into a concrete explanation.
Also ask which offenses the provision covers. A rule applicable to one physical act may not govern another charge, an image allegation, or conduct involving an authority relationship. A consultation should not stop after finding one favorable section while leaving the actual allegation unexamined.
Discuss willingness and authority separately
Tell the lawyer whether there are allegations of force, threats, intoxication, incapacity, or withdrawal of agreement. A close age gap does not resolve those issues. The lawyer needs the difficult facts as well as the facts that appear favorable.
Describe any teacher, coach, employer, caregiver, supervisory, or family relationship. Ask whether the relevant statute treats that relationship independently from age. Do not assume that attending the same school makes every interaction a peer relationship or that an informal role has no legal significance.
If a parent approved the dating relationship, mention it without treating it as a legal exemption. Parental approval, a teenager's willingness, and statutory capacity to consent answer different questions. Ask counsel to explain which of those facts the governing law makes relevant and which cannot change the result.
Raise image and messaging issues early
If explicit photographs, videos, or requests are involved, say so at intake. Do not attach the material without instructions. Describe who is depicted, their age when it was created, the platform, and whether the concern involves production, receipt, distribution, or a threat.
Ask whether the image issue requires a separate analysis from the physical relationship. The Department of Justice explains that federal image-law definitions use an under-eighteen threshold independent of a state's age of consent for sexual activity. That distinction can matter even where an age-related physical-contact charge appears inapplicable.
Text-only communications also deserve an accurate description. Ask whether alleged requests, threats, or arrangements raise solicitation or enticement concerns. “There were no photographs” can be relevant without ending the legal inquiry. The consultation should reflect the actual exchange rather than treating every digital interaction as the same offense.
Clarify representation before sharing a family account
Ask, “Who would be your client?” A parent paying the bill, the teenager, a complainant, and an accused partner may have different interests. A lawyer's involvement does not automatically mean every family member receives representation or has the same confidentiality protections.
Ask whether a parent or partner should attend the consultation and how their presence may affect confidentiality. Explain who will pay, who may receive updates, and who makes decisions. Get those arrangements clarified before assuming the person funding the work can direct the legal strategy.
Do not ask one lawyer to resolve conflicting stories for everyone simply because the families currently agree. A conflict can emerge later over testimony, blame, contact, or a proposed resolution. Identifying the appropriate client at the beginning protects the usefulness of the advice and avoids misunderstandings about whose interests are being served.
Ask what to do before the next interview or hearing
For an active investigation, ask how to respond to contact from law enforcement, the school, or another lawyer. Identify any existing request or document. Do not assume advice for a voluntary conversation also answers a subpoena or court-ordered appearance.
Ask about preserving records and handling devices, including messages that may appear unfavorable. Obtain instructions about explicit material before transferring it. A lawyer can explain lawful preservation and communication without having the family undertake its own evidence collection campaign.
For pending charges, ask about the next hearing's purpose, attendance requirements, and any release conditions. If an order limits contact, ask what it prohibits and how clarification is obtained. The immediate procedural plan may be more urgent than a final prediction about the case's outcome.
Explore consequences beyond the headline charge
Ask which possible outcomes could affect registration, education, employment, professional licensing, housing, or immigration. The relevant consequences depend on the jurisdiction, disposition, and person's circumstances; no generic checklist means every consequence applies.
If a plea or diversion option is discussed, request an explanation of its actual terms. Ask whether completion produces dismissal, whether a record remains, and whether separate relief would be needed later. Do not rely solely on a description such as “this keeps it minor” or “you can clear it eventually.”
For registration questions, ask whether both state and federal requirements need analysis and whether a future move changes the answer. A favorable result under one provision may leave another obligation intact. If the lawyer does not handle a specialized consequence, ask whether another professional should review it before a decision is made.
Make the scope and price concrete
Ask what the quoted fee includes: initial advice, investigation, hearings, negotiations, trial, appeal, or a separate registration petition. Ask about expenses, payment timing, and what circumstances could change the estimate. A written agreement should make the assignment understandable.
Discuss communication expectations too. Who handles routine updates? How are urgent developments reported? What documents should be provided, and through which secure channel? Knowing how to reach the team can prevent repeated messages to the wrong person when a deadline approaches.
Finally, ask the lawyer to summarize the next three steps and the unresolved questions. Write down who is responsible for each item and when it is due. A productive consultation does not need a guaranteed outcome. It needs a clear legal framework, candid limits, and a practical plan grounded in the actual facts.
Official sources and further reading
- Arizona Revised Statutes §13-1407 — defenses
- Department of Justice — federal image-law guide
- Department of Justice — criminal process and state differences